Novel hole transport layer of nickel oxide composite with carbon for high-performance perovskite solar cells
Sajid1, A M Elseman1,2, Jun Ji1, Shangyi Dou1, Hao Huang1, Peng Cui1, Dong Wei1, Meicheng Li1
State Key Laboratory of Alternate Electrical Power, System with Renewable Energy Sources, School of Renewable Energy, North China Electric Power University, Beijing 102206, China
Electronic & Magnetic Materials Department, Advanced Materials Division, Central Metallurgical Research and Development Institute (CMRDI), Helwan, Cairo 11421, Egypt

 

† Corresponding author. E-mail: mcli@ncepu.edu.cn

Abstract

A depth behavioral understanding for each layer in perovskite solar cells (PSCs) and their interfacial interactions as a whole has been emerged for further enhancement in power conversion efficiency (PCE). Herein, NiO@Carbon was not only simulated as a hole transport layer but also as a counter electrode at the same time in the planar heterojunction based PSCs with the program wxAMPS (analysis of microelectronic and photonic structures)-1D. Simulation results revealed a high dependence of PCE on the effect of band offset between hole transport material (HTM) and perovskite layers. Meanwhile, the valence band offset ( of NiO-HTM was optimized to be −0.1 to −0.3 eV lower than that of the perovskite layer. Additionally, a barrier cliff was identified to significantly influence the hole extraction at the HTM/absorber interface. Conversely, the between the active material and NiO@Carbon-HTM was derived to be −0.15 to 0.15 eV with an enhanced efficiency from 15% to 16%.

PACS: 73.22.-f
1. Introduction

Metal halide perovskite solar cells (PSCs) have been emerged as a kind of encouraging alternatives to existing photovoltaic technologies with both solution-processability and superior photovoltaic performance. Fundamental studies on perovskite materials,[1] device designs,[2,3] fabrication processes,[46] and materials engineering[713] have boosted the rapid development of PSCs. Consequently, a certified power conversion efficiency (PCE) of 22.1% have been obtained after the past several years of vigorous work. However, despite the overwhelming achievements in terms of performance of PSCs and long-term stability, current-voltage hysteresis still remains critical.[4] In order to obtain such enhanced performance and better stability, different organic and inorganic p-type semiconductor materials have been incorporated as hole extraction/hole transport layers (HTLs) in PSCs.[1419] Among these, inorganic p-type semiconductors are particularly attractive due to their high transmittance, high hole mobility, and high chemical stability.[14,15] Especially, nickel oxide (NiO) is an attractive inorganic p-type semiconductor since it can be readily deposited by a variety of methods. In addition, it has good chemical stability, excellent transmittance, wide band gap, and convenient energy level alignment with the perovskite. Collectively these properties facilitate hole collection and electron blocking.[2039] Thus, the stability of PSCs based on NiO-HTL has been significantly improved compared to commonly used poly (3, 4-ethylene dioxythiophene): polystyrene sulfonate (PDOT:PSS).[40,41] However, the achieved PCEs of NiO-based PSCs still lag behind of those established PSCs.[42,43] The conductivity of NiO can be increased by adjusting the stoichiometry of the films or by doping, while the implementation as top HTL via solvent engineering. Stoichiometric NiO is insulating, while the commonly observed p-type conductivity in undoped NiO is typically attributed to the nickel vacancies.[44,45] However, the hole density in undoped NiO is limited due to the large ionization energy of Ni vacancies. The hole density can be increased by extrinsic dopants with more shallow acceptor levels.[45] Indeed, the low conductivity and deposition of NiO as top HTL need to be addressed.[43] The common dopant used for NiO is Li, although other dopants such as Cu,[4648] Mg, Co, as well as co-doping approach with Li:Cu and Cs:Li[42,49,50] have been reported. The doped NiO HTLs such as Cu:NiOx,[46] LiCu:NiOx,[50] MgLi:NiOx,[41] and Cs:NiOx[42] have displayed PCEs of 17.30%, 14.53%, 18.3% and 19.35%, respectively. However, NiO@carbon composite is not applied to photovoltaic devices so far. Therefore, the incorporation of NiO@carbon-HTM with high conductivity and counter electrode behavior could be an effective way to achieve highly efficient PSCs at low cost. In simulation, the valence band offset ( of NiO-HTM was calculated to be −0.1 to 0.3 eV with high barrier cliff for the hole extraction at the HTM/perovskite interface. Conversely, between perovskite and NiO@carbon-HTM was derived to be −0.15 to 0.15 eV with an enhanced efficiency from 15% to 16%.

Herein, our work focused on the design of high-efficiency PSCs through investigating NiO@carbon material as top HTL with counter electrode characteristics. The comparison between NiO and NiO@carbon was simulated based on PSCs with the program wxAMPS. The simulation procedures of the effect of band offset between hole transport material (HTM) and perovskite layers were discussed.

2. Modeling of perovskite solar cell

Simulation methods describe the basic phenomena present in photovoltaic devices, allowing intuitive examination of each parameter and thus identifying the optimal operating conditions. In order to provide experimental direction, a theoretical study was performed using wxAMPS (Analysis of Microelectronic and Photonic Structure). The wxAMPS program assimilates intra-band tunneling model and trap-assisted tunneling model for more realistic aspects of heterojunction solar cells. The structure and energy band diagram of the employed device here are depicted in Figs. 1(a) and 1(b). In order to verify the effectiveness of our modelling approach, a device with NiO as HTM layer was first simulated and compared with reported experimental results. The AM 1.5G solar radiation spectrum was adopted as the illuminating source in the simulation. The light reflection of the top and the bottom contacts were set to be 0 and 1, respectively. The material parameters were summarized in Appendix A (Table A1) which was selected from reported experimental work.[5159] Capture cross sections of both electrons and holes were set which result in a carrier diffusion length of in absorber materials. The thickness of the active layer was set to arrange efficient carrier collection. The energy level defects in the simulated thin film materials were located at the middle of their band gap with the Gaussian type energetic distribution (characteristic energy of 0.1 eV). Tails characteristic energy was 0.01 eV with band tail density of states /eV. The bimolecular electron-hole recombination rate has the most significant influence on the performance of the solar cell. Therefore two considerations were taken to set bimolecular recombination rate. In the first assumption, the conduction band electrons were directed to vacant states in the valence band. This process was labeled as band-to-band or direct recombination (also known as intrinsic recombination). In the second assumption, electrons and holes recombine through intermediate gap states known as recombination centers. This was labeled as indirect recombination (also known as extrinsic recombination) or Shockley, Read, and Hall recombination. The net recombination term in the continuity equations takes both of these processes into consideration such that

Fig. 1. (color online) (a) Schematic cross section of n–i–p perovskite solar cells. (b) Energy band diagram.

The bimolecular recombination rate simply relies on an overlap of electron and hole wavefunctions while Auger processes involve energy and momentum transfer of the recombining electron–hole pair to a third charge carrier. The experimental values of THz photoconductivity transients for perovskite materials have been reported[60] to get charge recombination rates associated with both bimolecular and mono-molecular recombination rates as where n is the photoinduced charge carrier density. The first term on the RHS of Eq. (2) represents bimolecular recombination rate between photogenerated carriers while the second term denotes mono-molecular recombination rate. In addition, the recombination dynamics of the free charge carrier density (n) could be described by the following differential equation:.[61] where is the decay constant describing Auger recombination, the bimolecular recombination constant, and the rate for monomolecular processes such as trap-assisted charge recombination. According to these equations the bimolecular recombination rate value was set to be /s.[62] The surface recombination velocities of electrons and holes at the top and bottom electrodes were set to be /s. The interface recombination velocity (S) was evaluated by a numerical approach where R is the recombination rate within the interface layer, int stands for the whole interface layer, and m denotes the concentration of holes and electrons. The exact values of R and m are obtained from the numerical solution, and the integral of R across the whole interface layer represents the total interface recombination as mentioned in Eq. (1).

It has been noticed that wxAMPS software does not take into account the interface recombination losses. To overcome this shortcoming, two thin defect layers were inserted artificially at the interfaces of HTL/absorber layer and ETL/absorber layer as listed in supplementary information (Table A2). This allows to evaluate the role of interface modification in determining the performance of the device compatibility between simulated and experimental results.[59,6367]

3. Results and discussion

The photocurrent density-voltage characteristics of the simulated devices with inorganic HTMs are shown in Fig. 2. An efficiency of 15% was obtained for the FTO/TiO2/MAPbI3/NiOx/Au solar cell, closely reproducing the results reported by Liu et al.[43] The simulated current density is higher than the reported experimental data, which may be ascribed to the neglect of interface losses and the deposition constraint of non-stoichiometric NiOx in regular device configuration. Replacing NiOx with a new high mobility hole transporting material such as NiO@Carbon to get highly efficient regular planar heterojunction PSCs at low cost could be a promising route to fabrication via screen printing, doctor blading, and spin coating.[68] Further, the simulated investigations were focused on the effect of electrical conductivity of NiO@Carbon to provide a theoretical guideline in the performance of PSCs. Significantly, enhanced electrical conductivity, high fill factor (FF), and increased short circuit current density ( ) are observed in the NiO@carbon based PSCs as depicted in Fig. 2.

Fig. 2. (color online) Simulated photovoltaic characteristics, Psk = perovskite, cp = compact. Inset shows the photovoltaic parameters of the corresponding devices.

A further investigation on photoelectric behaviors of the device is shown in Fig. 3, whereby the recombination rate is illustrated to decrease with the efficient hole extraction through NiO@carbon-HTM. In fact, a pretty low trap-assisted recombination rate is observed in MAPbI3 films. This is closely related to the experimental values using transient THz spectroscopy.[69] The reduced recombination rate further corresponds to high , which is comparable with the one measured from transient decay experiment and intensity-modulated photovoltage spectroscopy (IMVS) method.[70] The performances of the proposed device are also attributed to low series resistance, efficient hole transport, and avoiding the possible formation of the Schottky junction at the HTM/CE interface.[41,42,46]

Fig. 3. (color online) Trends of carrier recombination and generation rates in PSCs based on NiO@Carbon and NiO hole transport materials.

Additionally, the impact of the band offset between HTMs/active layers on the performance of the device was also investigated. A thin absorber layer with higher defect density was inserted between HTM layer and the active layer to take into account interfacial carrier recombination. The discontinuous energy band diagram is due to the different electron affinity of the materials involved in the heterojunction. Figure 1(b) depicts the energy-level-alignment diagram of the PSC components before equilibrium (relative to the vacuum level) and the dashed lines depict the Fermi levels of different layers. Inorganic metal oxides possess advantages such as energetically favorable energy level alignment with perovskite layer with a deep-lying valence band. Therefore, the valance band offset between HTM/active layers is a key factor for carrier recombination at the interfaces, and thus determining open-circuit voltage ( to some extent through Fermi level pinning effect.

Indeed, the efficient device was obtained through optimization of the band offset matching of the materials at the interface to allow efficient holes extraction from the perovskite to valence band maximum (VBM) of the HTM without obvious energy loss. In this regard, we use the definition of electron affinity as follows: where is the difference of the electron affinity, is the difference of the band gapes, the conduction band offset, and the valence band offset.

The influence of on the performance of the solar cells was explored while maintaining the constant value of . The effect of between HTM and perovskite was not included in this study because the electron is significantly small, thus the carrier recombination associated with band offset should be negligible. The hole tunneling mechanism was simulated via wxAMPS when there is a barrier caused by band offset. The results reveal a quantitative basis for choosing an optimal hole extraction layer. The hole layer exhibits the value of VBM of −5.28 eV ( ) to −5.78 eV ( ) with the energy band of the perovskite solar cell using NiO as HTM as shown in Fig. 4.

Fig. 4. (color online) (a) Effect of on the efficiency of the perovskite solar cell. (b) Energy band of the perovskite solar cell using nickel oxide as HTM.

When the VBM of the HTM was slightly lower than the VBM of the perovskite ( ), a hole extraction barrier cliff was formed at the interface of HTM/absorber layer. Although the increases by further separation of the valence band in the reverse direction, the barrier takes the dominant role in decreasing the FF. This was related to large difference between the VBM of the HTM and perovskite. On the other hand, when was positive, the VBM of HTM was above the perovskite VBM which restricted the built-in voltage and resulted in lower efficiency. Thus, the optimum position of the valence band of HTM was derived to be −0.1 to −0.3 eV lower than that of the perovskite layer. In addition, figures 5(a) and 5(b) reveal the impact of band offset on the performance of the PSC and energy band position using NiO@carbon as HTM. When the is positive, decreases with increasing . However, is increased due to the decreasing which is more prominent when the VBM of HTM matches with the perovskite VBM. In conclusion, the optimum between the perovskite and HTM based on NiO@Carbon is derived to be −0.15 to 0.15 eV.

Fig. 5. (color online) (a) Effect of on the efficiency of the perovskite solar cell. (b) Energy band of the perovskite solar cell using NiO@carbon as HTM.
4. Conclusion

NiO@carbon was simulated using wxAMPS software as an update of the popular solar cell simulation tool (AMPS; analysis of microelectronic and photonic structures). The models of solar cells were constructed with thin film stacks of glass/FTO/cp-TiO2/MAPbI3/NiO@carbon. The shortcoming in each device configuration was write minimized instead of performed by inserting thin defect layers at the interfaces of HTL/absorber layer and ETL/absorber layer. Simulation results indicate that owing to the low , combined with superior conductivity, NiO@carbon HTM can exhibit both high and values. Additionally, low recombination rates, efficient hole transport, and avoiding the possible formation of the Schottky junction at the HTM/CE interface led to an inspiring efficiency of 16% under moderate conditions, further highlighting the great potential of NiO@carbon HTM in achieving high PCEs. In particular, such inorganic HTM could be fabricated through doctor blading and screen printing techniques for the device optimization at low cost. The results simulated here should provide both the insight and understanding of the role of NiO@Carbon HTM in PSCs and help to establish device parameters that allow for further analysis and design optimization.

Reference
[1] Kojima A Teshima K Shirai Y Miyasaka T 2009 J. Am. Chem. Soc. 131 6050
[2] Lee M M Teuscher J Miyasaka T Murakami T N Snaith H J 2012 Science 338 643
[3] Kim H S Lee C R Im J H Lee K B Moehl T Marchioro A Moon S J Humphry-Baker R Yum J H Moser J E 2012 Sci. Rep. 2
[4] Burschka J Pellet N Moon S J Humphry-Baker R Gao P Nazeeruddin M K Grätzel M 2013 Nature 499 316
[5] Liu M Johnston M B Snaith H J 2013 Nature 501 395
[6] Jeon N J Noh J H Kim Y C Yang W S Ryu S Seok S I 2014 Nat. Mater. 13 897
[7] Jeon N J Noh J H Yang W S Kim Y C Ryu S Seo J Seok S I 2015 Nature 517 476
[8] Yang W S Noh J H Jeon N J Kim Y C Ryu S Seo J Seok S I 2015 Science 348 1234
[9] Yuan X Z Chao W Shi H 2017 Chin. Phys. Lett. 34 047304
[10] Yao J Wei Q Ma Q Y Wu D J 2017 Chin. Phys. 26 057302
[11] Zeng H D Zhu Z Y Zhang J D Cheng X L 2017 Chin. Phys. 26 056101
[12] Liu P Yang B C Liu G Wu R S Zhang C J Wang F Li S G Yang J L Gao Y L Zhou C H 2017 Chin. Phys. 26 058401
[13] Rashad M M Elseman A M Hassan A M 2016 Optik-International Journal for Light and Electron Optics 127 9775
[14] Yan W Ye S Li Y Sun W Rao H Liu Z Bian Z Huang C 2016 Adv. Energy Mater. 6 17
[15] Li M H Shen P S Wang K C Guo T F Chen P 2015 J. Mater. Chem. 3 9011
[16] Yang L Cai F Yan Y Li J Liu D Pearson A J Wang T 2017 Adv. Function. Mater.
[17] Zhao D Sexton M Park H Y Baure G Nino J C So F 2015 Adv. Energy Mater. 5 6
[18] Zuo C Ding L 2015 Small 11 5528
[19] Elseman A M Rashad M M Hassan A M 2016 ACS Sustainable Chemistry & Engineering 4 4875
[20] Zhang J Gu P Xu J Xue H Pang H 2016 Nanoscale 8 18578
[21] Chen W Xu L Feng X Jie J He Z 2017 Adv. Mater. 29 16
[22] Rao H Ye S Sun W Yan W Li Y Peng H Liu Z Bian Z Li Y Huang C 2016 Nano Energy 27 51
[23] Trifiletti V Roiati V Colella S Giannuzzi R De Marco L Rizzo A Manca M Listorti A Gigli G 2015 ACS Applied Materials & Interfaces 7 4283
[24] Cao K Zuo Z Cui J Shen Y Moehl T Zakeeruddin S M Grätzel M Wang M 2015 Nano Energy 17 171
[25] Park J H Seo J Park S Shin S S Kim Y C Jeon N J Shin H W Ahn T K Noh J H Yoon S C 2015 Adv. Mater. 27 4013
[26] Cui J Meng F Zhang H Cao K Yuan H Cheng Y Huang F Wang M 2014 ACS Appl. Mater. Interf. 6 22862
[27] Wang K C Shen P S Li M H Chen S Lin M W Chen P Guo T F 2014 ACS Appl. Mater. Interf. 6 11851
[28] Liu Z Zhang M Xu X Cai F Yuan H Bu L Li W Zhu A Zhao Z Wang M 2015 J. Mater. Chem. 3 24121
[29] Yin X Liu J Ma J Zhang C Chen P Que M Yang Y Que W Niu C Shao J 2016 J. Power Sources 329 398
[30] Cui J Li P Chen Z Cao K Li D Han J Shen Y Peng M Fu Y Q Wang M 2016 Appl. Phys. Lett. 109 171103
[31] Kwon U Kim B G Nguyen D C Park J H Ha N Y Kim S J Ko S H Lee S Lee D Park H J 2016 Sci. Rep. 6 30759
[32] Subbiah A S Halder A Ghosh S Mahuli N Hodes G Sarkar S K 2014 J. Phys. Chem. Lett. 5 1748
[33] Jeng J Y Chen K C Chiang T Y Lin P Y Tsai T D Chang Y C Guo T F Chen P Wen T C Hsu Y J 2014 Adv. Mater. 26 4107
[34] Hu L Peng J Wang W Xia Z Yuan J Lu J Huang X Ma W Song H Chen W 2014 Acs. Photon. 1 547
[35] Hou Y Chen W Baran D Stubhan T Luechinger N A Hartmeier B Richter M Min J Chen S Quiroz C O R 2016 Adv. Mater. 28 5112
[36] Yin X Chen P Que M Xing Y Que W Niu C Shao J 2016 ACS Nano 10 3630
[37] You J Meng L Song T B Guo T F Chang W H Hong Z Chen H Zhou H Chen Q Liu Y 2016 Nat. Nanotech. 11 75
[38] Seo S Park I J Kim M Lee S Bae C Jung H S Park N G Kim J Y Shin H 2016 Nanoscale 8 11403
[39] Corani A Li M H Shen P S Chen P Guo T F El Nahhas A Zheng K Yartsev A Sundström V Ponseca C S Jr. 2016 J. Phys. Chem. Lett. 7 1096
[40] Chen W Zhu Y Yu Y Xu L Zhang G He Z 2016 Chem. Mater. 28 4879
[41] Chen W Wu Y Yue Y Liu J Zhang W Yang X Chen H Bi E Ashraful I Grätzel M 2015 Science 350 944
[42] Chen W Liu F Z Feng X Y Djurišić A B Chan W K He Z B 2017 Adv. Energy Mater.
[43] Liu Z Zhu A Cai F Tao L Zhou Y Zhao Z Chen Q Cheng Y B Zhou H 2017 J. Mater. Chem. 5 6597
[44] Lany S Osorio-Guillén J Zunger A 2007 Phys. Rev. 75 241203
[45] Zhang K H Xi K Blamire M G Egdell R G 2016 J. Phys.: Conden. Matter 28 383002
[46] Jung J W Chueh C C Jen A K Y 2015 Adv. Mater. 27 7874
[47] Yang Z Chueh C C Liang P W Crump M Lin F Zhu Z Jen A K Y 2016 Nano Energy 22 328
[48] Rajagopal A Williams S T Chueh C C Jen A K Y 2016 J. Phys. Chem. Lett. 7 995
[49] Natu G Hasin P Huang Z Ji Z He M Wu Y 2012 ACS Appl. Mater. Interf. 4 5922
[50] Liu M H Zhou Z J Zhang P P Tian Q W Zhou W H Kou D X Wu S X 2016 Opt. Express 24 A1349
[51] Elseman A Shalan A Rashad M Hassan A 2017 Mater. Sci. Semicond. Process. 66 176
[52] Son M K Steier L Schreier M Mayer M T Luo J Grätzel M 2017 Energy & Environmental Science 10 912
[53] Sato K Kim S Komuro S Zhao X 2016 Jpn. J. Appl. Phys. 55 06GJ10
[54] Vahini R Kumar P S Karuthapandian S 2016 Appl. Phys. 122 1
[55] Wang M Han J Hu Y Guo R Yin Y 2016 ACS Appl. Mater. Interf. 8 29511
[56] Yang X Wu G Zhu C Zou W Gao Y Tian J Zheng Z 2016 J. Colloid Interface Science 469 287
[57] Akhtar N El-Safty S A Abdelsalam M E Kawarada H 2015 Adv. Healthcare Mater 4 2110
[58] Litzov I Brabec C J 2013 Materials 6 5796
[59] Liu F Zhu J Wei J Li Y Lv M Yang S Zhang B Yao J Dai S 2014 Appl. Phys. Lett. 104 253508
[60] Noel N K Stranks S D Abate A Wehrenfennig C Guarnera S Haghighirad A A Sadhanala A Eperon G E Pathak S K Johnston M B 2014 Energy & Environmental Science 7 3061
[61] Wehrenfennig C Liu M Snaith H J Johnston M B Herz L M 2014 Energy & Environmental Science 7 2269
[62] Wang Y Xia Z Liu Y Zhou H 2015 Simulation of Perovskite Solar Cells with Inorganic Hole Transporting Materials. In Photovoltaic Specialist Conference (PVSC), 2015 IEEE 42nd 1
[63] Cuiffi J Benanti T Nam W J Fonash S 2010 Appl. Phys. Lett. 96 73
[64] Kemp K W Labelle A J Thon S M Ip A H Kramer I J Hoogland S Sargent E H 2013 Adv. Energy Mater. 3 917
[65] Wang T Chen J Wu G Song D Li M 2017 Journal of Semiconductors 38 014005
[66] Wang T Chen J Wu G Li M 2016 Sci. China Mater. 59 703
[67] Boussettine A Belhadji Y Benmansour A 2012 Energy Procedia 18 693
[68] Gao M W Ye C Wang X Y He Y S Guo J M Yang P F 2016 Chin. Phys. 25 075202
[69] Wehrenfennig C Eperon G E Johnston M B Snaith H J Herz L M 2014 Adv. Mater. 26 1584
[70] Bi D Yang L Boschloo G Hagfeldt A Johansson E M 2013 J. Phys. Chem. Lett. 4 1532